tech news

Who’s the funnier Cards Against Humanity writer – AI or humans?

As a part of its quirky annual Black Friday custom, this 12 months the creators of the Playing cards Towards Humanity (CAH) recreation had their writers compete towards an Synthetic Intelligence (AI) in a viral stunt to see who would make up the most well-liked playing cards.

Not content material to pit man towards machine for mere bragging rights, CAH administration upped the stakes additional by stating that if the human writers gained, they might every get a US$5,000 (RM20,900) vacation bonus. If the AI gained, the human writers can be fired.

CAH added that whoever offered essentially the most card packs over the 16-hour Black Friday contest interval can be declared the winner. Every pack offered would comprise the 30 hottest playing cards written by both the human staff or the AI.

“Sure! We really took the time to construct an actual machine-learning algorithm that generates Playing cards Towards Humanity playing cards. Or extra precisely, we employed some child from the Web to make it, ” they stated, within the FAQ.

Tech journalist Spencer Kelly – the “Web child” that wrote the AI – explains that the AI was constructed on prime of AI firm OpenAI’s GPT-2 neural community, which is designed to generate real looking textual content by predicting what phrases is sensible collectively (like Google’s predictive textual content).

The GPT-2 got here already educated in textual content and popular culture, having gone by way of 40GB of Web textual content – which is roughly equal to 40,000 books.

To make sure it writes in CAH’s fashion, Kelly educated it additional with 44,000 CAH playing cards made up of about 2,000 actual printed playing cards, 25,000 card concepts that have been by no means printed and 17,000 unofficial playing cards from fan-curated lists.

He additionally utilized a filter to the AI’s concepts, chopping out playing cards with phrases banned by CAH, these with dangerous grammar and spelling, and those who have been too just like current playing cards.

In the course of the contest, customers might see the playing cards being generated by the writers and AI on the CAH web site, upvote those they preferred, and buy a US$5 (RM20.90) pack to vote for whichever assortment they preferred extra.

So who gained? The writers narrowly beat the AI, with customers shopping for US$82,860 (RM346,354) value of packs versus US$81,135 (RM339,144) of the AI’s packs.

“The writers offered 2% extra packs, so their jobs shall be changed by automation later as a substitute of proper now. Pleased Holidays,” concluded the CAH administration.

Article kind: free

Consumer entry standing: 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *